| December 2009 |
|
|
|
| December 2009 |
|
Calling All Writers! Well, Maybe Not All Writers Please send contact information and writing samples (if you have them) to editor Jim Mullin: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
North Miami has free parking! Dan Lundberg North Miami
Ironically, they were able to spend thousands of dollars on the rebuilding, but apparently forgot to include an automatic garage-door opener, which would have rendered it unnecessary for the wife to get out of their vehicle to open the garage door, which is when the robbery occurred. Now they want a guardhouse built on NE 96th Street at NE 10th Avenue -- and have other residents pay for it. Get real. Ellen Willis Miami Shores
This idea probably sounded better in Jeff Davis’s head. It’s about as effective as those red-light cameras, which enforce the law after the crime has been committed. This certainly does not help with prevention or with the consequences of the crime. How can we feel safer? Most police departments increase their presence in areas where the crime rate has gone up. Police departments generally do this automatically, but when they don’t, any resident can request it. You simply have to ask. Miami Shores has its own police department, so there should be no excuses. Police are here to serve and protect, or so I’ve been told, and we give them about one-third of our municipal budget to do so. The armed robbery the Davis family went through is appalling, but it shouldn’t be used as a way to keep track of law-abiding citizens. Furthermore, the information collected by a guardhouse camera is a liability in itself. The added cost is an unnecessary burden, and it is simply redundant. One squad car making rounds can be more beneficial. Besides, any plate you do identify from a getaway vehicle is probably going to be that of a stolen car. Possibly your neighbor’s car. Angel Correa Miami Shores
I suggest that Jeff next write article about what I believe is another aberration of nature present in South Florida yards: Trees shaped to look like lollipops. Nature is the best architect and designer. We should try to let trees look like trees. Laura Santamaria Miami
Our town put its faith in the empty promises of this amendment’s supporters. We were told that they just wanted to “give the people a say” on growth. But that is not what they wanted to do, and that is not what happened. Since this measure was passed, the residents of St. Pete Beach have seen endless lawsuits, higher costs, and little progress. Even die-hard disciples of Amendment 4 have since reverted back to common sense. In St. Pete Beach, any proposed change to our town’s comprehensive plan was thrust onto the ballot. Public planning was replaced with political infighting. A parade of unintended consequences quickly followed. After adopting our local version of Amendment 4, it wasn’t long before we realized that telephone-book-size comprehensive plans were not easily condensed into 75-word ballot questions. The elections were confusing, chaotic, and expensive for taxpayers. Many local businesses became victims of this impossible process. Not surprisingly, our tourism-based economy began to wither, and too many families felt the effects. Once a beacon of prosperity, St. Pete Beach is now known for its chaotic business climate. Over time, many voters became frustrated by the lack of common-sense progress. As a result, they supported a plan to reinvigorate our ailing economy. In a 2008 election, the voters of St. Pete Beach approved a series of changes to our local comprehensive plan. Within 24 hours of the election, the same interest group that first proposed our local version of Amendment 4 had filed a lawsuit to overturn the entire election! To date, Amendment 4 supporters have filed nearly a dozen lawsuits and administrative challenges -- all aimed at invalidating the will of the people. All told, litigation has cost our taxpayers roughly $500,000. And there is no end in sight. We do not need to look to California or anywhere else for an Amendment 4 example. We have our very own disaster right here in Florida -- it’s called the cautionary tale of St. Pete Beach. Ward Friszolowski St. Pete Beach
Editor’s note: Ward Friszolowski, an architect, was elected to the St. Peter Beach City Commission in 1994. He served as mayor from 2000 to 2008.
Just as I was getting settled on the idea that Biscayne Times is a well-edited, informative, and interesting publication, this happens. It was disappointing. However, I still think the BT is informative and interesting, so thank you for that. Upper Eastside Editor’s note: Ouch! As a result of a production error, the headline from Jenni’s October column was repeated in the November issue. It should have read: “Kids + Books = Success: Get your kids hooked on reading, and have some fun at Miami Book Fair International.” Our apologies.
Now, what would make the BT a keeper is to get the garden columnist, Jeff Shimonski, a guy with a jones for Latin, to tell us where we can buy a Hylocereus undatus. The high and mighty Sunday Miami Herald consistently hypes local native plants, but invariably fails to tell us where you can buy them. DC Copeland Hibiscus Island Editor’s note: Jeff Shimonski suggests this: “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum.”
|
![]() An artist uses her camera to make a park intervention. |
| Read more... |
Sales, special events, and more from the people who make Biscayne Times possible.. |
| Read more... |